Preview

Plant Biology and Horticulture: theory, innovation

Advanced search

Features of hybridization of garden roses in the conditions of the Southern Coast of the Crimea

https://doi.org/10.25684/2712-7788-2023-4-169-89-97

Abstract

Despite the fact that hybridization underlies both the evolution of the genus Rosa L. and the creation of a modern assortment of garden roses and is the main method of breeding these plants, the technique of hybridization, especially distant hybridization, has not yet been sufficiently developed. To develop such a technique in the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens, the experience of breeding work with roses over the past 70 years has been summarized. Three main stages of new rose cultivars breeding by hybridization method have been identified, as well as the optimal timing for them has been established. The first stage is carried out during the first year of work and includes the selection of parental pairs, preparation of the mother plant, pollen harvesting, artificial pollination, and then the collection and sowing of fruits. A number of cultivars, both prone and not prone to autogamy, have been identified. It has been established that in distant crosses, species should be used as paternal parental forms, and when crossing cultivars with different ploidy, triploid cultivars are used mainly as paternal forms, and tetraploid and diploid cultivars and species - as both paternal and maternal parental forms. The best terms for harvesting pollen, methods of its storage, as well as the optimal terms for artificial pollination, taking into account the age of the flower, weather conditions, and other factors, have been determined. Efficiency of reciprocal crosses, as well as repeated application of pollen to the stigmas of pistils for at least 5 days, has been established.

About the Authors

Z. K. Klimenko
Никитский ботанический сад – Национальный научный центр РАН
Russian Federation


S. A. Plugatar
Никитский ботанический сад – Национальный научный центр РАН
Russian Federation


V. K. Zykova
Никитский ботанический сад – Национальный научный центр РАН
Russian Federation


References

1. Beideman, I.N. Methodology of plants phenology and plants community investigation. Novosibirsk: Edit. AS USSR, 1974. 155 p.

2. Bylov V.N. Fundamentals of comparative variety evaluation of ornamental plants. In: Introduction and Selection of Flower Plants, Moscow: Nauka, 1978. P. 7–32.

3. Galichenko A.A. Nikolay Hartwiss and the collection of roses of the Imperial Botanical Garden // Bulletin of the State Nikitsky Botanical Gardens. 2001. 83: 16–19.

4. Golubinsky I. N. Biology of pollen germination. Kiev: Nauk. dumka, 1974. 368 p.

5. Gonchrov N.P., Goncharov P.L. Methodical basis of plant breeding. Second edition. Novosibirsk: Academic publishing house Geo, 2009. 427 p.

6. Kelchevskaya L.S. Methods of processing of observations in agroclimatology. Leningrad, 1971. 216 p.

7. Klimenko V.N., Klimenko Z.K. Roses. Simpheropol: Tavria, 1974. 208 p.

8. Klimenko Z.K. Biological bases of breeding of garden roses in the south of Ukraine: dissertation abstract of the Doctor of Biological Sciences / Nikitsky Botanical Gardens. Yalta, 1996. 74 p.

9. Klimenko Z.K. The results of long-term work (1824-2010) on the breeding of garden roses in the Nikitsky Botanical Gardens // Bulletin of the State Nikitsky Botanical Gardens. 2010. 100: 40–55.

10. Methodology of state variety testing of agricultural crops. Issue. 6 (ornamental crops). Moscow: Kolos, 1968. 224 p.

11. The method of primary cultivar study of garden roses. Yalta. 1971. 18 p.

12. Methodology for testing for distinctness, uniformity and stability. Rose (Rosa L.). Moscow, 2007. 21 p.

13. Guidelines for the detection and accounting of diseases of flower crops. Moscow: Kolos, 1974. 14 p.

14. Pausheva Z.P. Practicum on plant Cytology. Moscow: Agropromizdat, 1988. 271 p.

15. Plugatar S.A. Bioecological features of flowering hybrid tea roses in the conditions of the Southern Coast of the Crimea // Agroinfo. 2018. 3 (33): 15.

16. Plugatar S.A. Hybrid tea roses: biological features, cultivar evaluation, use in gardening in the South of Russia. – Simferopol: Polyprint, 2019. 227 p.

17. Saakov S.G. Rieksta D.A. Roses. Riga: Zinatne. 1973. 352 p.

18. Shantser A.I. Kutlunina N.A. Interspecific hybridization in wild roses of the section Caninae DC // Proceedings of the RAS. Series Biological. 2010. 5: 564–573.

19. Shantser A.I. Reticulated evolution in the genus Rosa L.: paleobotanical findings, morphological systematics, and molecular data. Supplement to the magazine "Lethaea rossica". 2015. 2: 161–164.

20. Mc Farland H. Modern Roses 12. Shreveport: The American Rose Society, 2007. 576 p.

21. Sanyal F. Studies on the pollen tube growth in six species of Hibiscus and their crosses in vitro. Cytologia 1958. 35 (4).


Review

For citations:


Klimenko Z.K., Plugatar S.A., Zykova V.K. Features of hybridization of garden roses in the conditions of the Southern Coast of the Crimea. Plant Biology and Horticulture: theory, innovation. 2023;(4 (169)):89-97. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.25684/2712-7788-2023-4-169-89-97

Views: 174


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-7788 (Print)