Preview

Plant Biology and Horticulture: theory, innovation

Advanced search

Methods of supporting the development of Phytophthora cinnamomi rands on representatives of the Ericaceae DC family. In the orangeries of the Botanical garden of Peter the Great

https://doi.org/10.36305/2712-7788-2020-4-157-26-33

Abstract

In recent years, in the orangeries of the Peter the Great Botanical Garden, the affection of representatives of the Ericaceae family, the genus rhododendron (Rhododendron (L.) oomycete Phytophthora cinnamomi, has been growing. In the study of the rhizospheric soil of sick and healthy plants, a wide distribution of Phytophthora was found. representatives of this family. The dynamics of the spread of the disease from 2012 to 2019 is presented. The population of Phytophthora cinnamomi in the soils is unevenly distributed, changing its structure (abundance, survival, seasonality, life cycle) in accordance with various micro -phytocenoses. The population structure is governed by coenotic relationships with soil microorganisms. The Phytophthora cinnamomi population is “pulsating,” with a maximum population (in May-June) and a minimum in NovemberDecember. The creation of suppressive soils and suppression factors may serve as a preliminary strategy when creating measures to protect plants of the Peter the Great Botanical Garden. The results of studies of the effects of biological products (Vitaplan, Sternifag, Gliokladin) and fertilizers (Potassium humate, Ecofus) on the pathogen are presented. To increase immunity, resistance inducers (immunocytophyte, sillplant, chitosan) were used.

About the Authors

E. A. Varfolomeeva
Ботанический институт им. В.Л. Комарова РАН
Russian Federation


E. O. Rezanko
Ботанический институт им. В.Л. Комарова РАН
Russian Federation


References

1. Веденяпина Е.Г. Популяция Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands в почвах различных фитоценозов // Микология и фитопатология. 1985. Том 19. Вып. 4. С. 322-329. [Vedenyapina E.G. Population of Phytophthora cinnamomi Rands in soils of various phytocenoses. Mycology and Phytopathology. 1985. 19 (4): 322-329]

2. Веденяпина Е.Г. Использование методов приманок и селективных сред при изучении грибов классов Oomycetes и Zygomycetes в шампиньонном субстрате // Микология и фитопатология. 1994. Том 28. Вып. 3. С. 28-33 [Vedenyapina E.G. Use of methods of baits and selective media in the study of fungi of the Oomycetes and Zygomycetes classes in the mushroom substrate. Mycology and Phytopathology. 1994. 28 (3): 28-33]

3. Веденяпина Е.Г. Почвообитающие фитофторы в оранжерейном комплексе БИН РАН // Иммунопатология, аллергология, инфектология. 2010. № 1. С. 93. [Vedenyapina E.G. Soil-dwelling phytophthora in the greenhouse complex of the BIN RAS. Immunopathology, Allergology, Infectology. 2010. 1: 93]

4. Веденяпина Е.Г., Варфоломеева Е.А. Мониторинг почвенных популяций Phytophthora cinnamomi при обработке грунта оранжерей ботанического института различными биопрепаратами // Современная микология в России. Материалы III съезда микологов России. 2012. С. 322-323. [Vedenyapina E.G., Varfolomeeva E.A. Monitoring of soil populations of Phytophthora cinnamomi when processing the soil of greenhouses of the Botanical Institute with various biological products. In: Modern Mycology in Russia. Materials of the III Congress of mycologists of Russia. 2012. P. 322-323]

5. Дорожкина Л.А., Мисриева Б.У., Приходько Е.С. Экофус−новое органоминеральное удобрение // Агрохимический вестник. 2014. №6. С. 33−36. [Dorozhkina L.A., Misrieva B.W., Prikhodko E.S. Ecofys − a new organic-mineral fertilizer. Agrochemical messenger. 2014. 6: 33-36]

6. Левинский Б.В. Все о гуматах. Иркутск. 1999. 40 с. [Levinsky B.V. All about humates. Irkutsk, 1999. 40 p.]

7. Томилин Б.А., Веденяпина Е.Б. Супрессивность почв в связи с вопросами фитофт орозной инфекции // Микроорганизмы в сельском хозяйстве. Москва. 1986. С. 57−58. [Tomilin B.A., Vedenyapina E.B. Soil suppressiveness in connection with late blight infection // Microorganisms in agriculture. Moscow, 1986. P. 57-58]

8. Фирсов Г.А. Уровни адаптированности древесных растений и фенологическая ситуация в Санкт-Петербурге в условиях потепления климата // Ботаника в современном мире. Тр. XIV съезда Русск. бот. общ-ва и конф. (г. Махачкала, 18−23 июня 2018 г.). Махачкала: АЛЕФ, 2018. С. 338-341. [Firsov G.A. Levels of adaptation of woody plants and the phenological situation in St. Petersburg in the conditions of climate warming. Botany in the modern world. Works of XIV Congress of Russian bot. General and Conf. (Makhachkala, June 18-23, 2018). Makhachkala: ALEF. 2018, P. 338-341.]

9. Huber D.M., Schneider R.W. The description and occurrence of suppressive soils. In: Schneider R.W. ed. Suppressive Solis and Plant Disease. St. Paul. MN: The American Phytopathological Society. 1982. P. 1-7.

10. Stout M.J., Fidantsef A.L., Duffey S.S., Bostock R.M. 1999. Signal interactions in pathogen and insect attack: systemic plant-mediated interactions between pathogens and herbivores of the tomato, Lycopersicon esculentum // Physiol. Mol. Plant Pathol. Vol. 54. P. 115-130.


Review

For citations:


Varfolomeeva E.A., Rezanko E.O. Methods of supporting the development of Phytophthora cinnamomi rands on representatives of the Ericaceae DC family. In the orangeries of the Botanical garden of Peter the Great. Plant Biology and Horticulture: theory, innovation. 2020;1(157):26-33. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36305/2712-7788-2020-4-157-26-33

Views: 283


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2712-7788 (Print)