State, population characteristics of Tulipa biebersteiniana Schult & Schult Fil. on the territory of the left bank of Transnistria and features of its reproduction in vivo and in vitro
https://doi.org/10.36305/2712-7788-2020-3-156-122-135
Abstract
The ontogenetic states of T. biebersteiniana in the broad interpretation which grows in Transdnistria was refined. In the tract of Kalagur-Stroentsy four age states were defined, on limestone faults along the valley of the Dniester - five. A comparative study of the main demographic indicators of mesophilic and xerophilous ecological groups of T. biebersteiniana has been conducted. The morphometric indicators of the populations of both ecogroups have been identified and analyzed: total population density, ontogenetic spectrum, projective cover, and age and efficathy indices. The method of propagation of mesophilic and xerophilous ecogroups representatives has been clarified. Mesophilic plants propagated vegetatively, the forming bulbs have a sporophyte origin, and the mature mesophilic populations are renewed homophasically. Xerophilous plants reproduce mainly sexually; the reproduction of developing populations is mainly heterophasic. Both ecogroups were rejuvenated, so their resistance as the survival in phytocenosis was unified by the comparable reproduction and replacement indices. The surveyed mesophilic and xerophilous populations were classified as young, left-handed, normal, and incomplete. Populations of both ecogroups, being young, with high reproduction and replacement indices, were not affected by the tulip breaking virus, and were relatively resistant and adapted to their biotope. Prospects for their continued existence now are quite favorable in the absence of sudden and sharp effects on them of possible biotic and abiotic stressors. There is a low net reproduction in the plants of the mesophilic group in natural populations. The inducing of additional micro bulbs in the culture of in vitro based on indirect somatic embryogenesis is promising to increase T. biebersteiniana propagation rate.
About the Authors
O. O. TiminaMoldova, Republic of
L. G. Ionova
Moldova, Republic of
O. Y. Timin
Moldova, Republic of
References
1. Vitko K.R. Tulip Bieberstein // Plant World of Moldova: Forest Plants / Ed. A.A. Chebotar, T.S. Heideman, L.P. Nikolaeva. Chisinau: Stienca, 1986. P. 163-164
2. Zhivotovskiy L.A. Ontogenetic conditions, effective density and classification of plant populations. Ecology. 2001. 1: 3-7
3. Zhukova L.A. Population life of meadow plants. Yoshkar-Ola: RIIN "Lanar," 1995. 224 p.
4. Zhilkina I.N., Tishchenkova V.S. On the flora of the surrounding area of the s. Rashkovo / Biodiversitatea vegetala Republicii Moldova. Chisinau: Centrul Editorial al USM, 2001. P. 112-116
5. Knyazev M.S., Kulikov P.V., Filippov E.G. Tulips kinship Tulipa biebersteiniana (Liliaceae) in the Southern Urals. Bot. Jurn. 2001. 86 (3): 109-119
6. Kobozeva E.A. Biomorphology and population ecology of bulbous plants in different natural areas of the Volga Hills (example of Tulipa biebersteiniana Shult. Et Shult. Fil. And Lilium martagon L.): abstract of a thesis... Kand. Biol. Science: 03.02.01 – botany / Moscow Teachers' State University. M., 2010. 23 p.
7. The Red Book of Transdnistria / V.S. Rushchuk, A.D. Rushchuk, A.A. Tishchenkov. Tiraspol: B. I., 2009. 376 p.
8. Lakin G.F. Biometrics. M.: High School, 1990. 352 p.
9. Lyu Than' Ngok. Eco-biomorphological characteristic and structure of coenotic populations of tulip species (Tulipa L.) in the state natural biosphere reserve "Black Lands": abstract of a thesis... Kand. Biol. Science: 03.02.08 - ecology. / Rostov-on-Don, 2017. 24 p.
10. Mordak E.V. Tulip (Tulipa) // Flora of the European part of the USSR. T.IV. L.: Science. 1979. P. 232-236
11. Mukhametshina L.V., Ishmuratova A.M., Mullabayeva E.S. Features of biology and coenotic population characteristics of species of the genus Tulipa L. in the Southern Urals. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Biology. Earth Sciences. 2015. 25 (2). P.101-108
12. Identification of ontogenetic structure and vitality of coenotic populations: Methodical recommendations/ Com. O.O.Timina, V.F. Khlebnikov, L.I. Ionova. Tiraspol: Transdniestrian Univesity Press. 2017. 40 p.
13. Osmanova G.O., Zhivotovskiy L.A. Principles and methods of studying plant coenotic population biology / Materials of XII All-Russian Population Workshop in memory of Nikolai Glotov (1939-2016). Yoshkar-Ola. 2017. P. 164-166
14. Rabotnov T.A. Phytocenology. Moscow: Moscow University Press, 1992. 352 p.
15. Rushchuk A.D. Planning of the Transdniestrian sector of the environmental network / Environmental networks - experience and approaches. Materials of a conference. Chisinau: Biotica, 2012. P. 94-104
16. Stepanova N.Yu., Ermakova E.A., Loktev M.A. Problem of taxonomy of tulips subgenus Eriostemones of European Russia // Systematic and floral studies of Northern Eurasia: materials of the II International Conference (to the 90th anniversary of the birth of Professor A.G. Elenevsky), Moscow, December 5-8, 2018 / Ed. V.P. Viktorov. Moscow: MPSU press, 2018. P. 39-43
17. Timina O.O., Ionova L.G., Timin O.Yu. Species composition of viruses that affect tulips in Transdnistria / Floriculture: Theoretical and practical aspects. Collected articles of scientific works by the SNBG. T. 145. M., 2017. P. 297-304
18. Tishchenkova V.S. Flora tracts Kalagur-Stroenets Rashkov Petrophilic complex / Geoecological and bioecological problems of the Northern Black Sea: Materials of a of the V Internar. conference. Tiraspol: Transdnistria. Press, 2014. P. 267-269
19. Uranov A.A. Age spectrum of phytocenopopulations as a function of time and energy wave processes. Biological sciences. 1975. 2: 7-33
20. Cherepanov S.K. Vascular plants of Russia and neighboring states (within the former USSR). St. Petersburg: Peace and Family, 1995. 992 p.
Review
For citations:
Timina O.O., Ionova L.G., Timin O.Y. State, population characteristics of Tulipa biebersteiniana Schult & Schult Fil. on the territory of the left bank of Transnistria and features of its reproduction in vivo and in vitro. Plant Biology and Horticulture: theory, innovation. 2020;(156):122-135. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36305/2712-7788-2020-3-156-122-135