Comprehensive evaluation of hybrid forms of peach selections of the Nikita Botanical Gardens
https://doi.org/10.36305/2019-4-153-121-128
Abstract
Aim. The main purpose of studying hybrid forms of peach is to single out the most valuable ones for further breeding practice, improve the existing assortment of peach and transfer new cultivars to the State Commission for Variety Testing of the Russian Federation. Methods. To distinguish forms characterized by a set of indicators of economically valuable traits, a cluster method of comparative evaluation of hybrids with control cultivars of the corresponding fruit ripening period was carried out and pair correlation coefficients of these traits were determined. Results. As a result of the study, the greatest correlation was found between productivity and laying of generative buds, fruit mass and frost damage to the buds in winter; laying buds and frost damage to the buds in winter; fruit taste and dry matter content and their ripening period; solids content and total sugar; damage to generative buds by return frosts in spring with frost damage in winter. Main conclusions. 7 hybrid forms distinguished by a set of traits: Veteran x Favorita Morettini 80-686, Zlatogor x Uspar-I 80-367, Golden Jubilee self-poll. 65-105, Tszy-yan-shuj-mi-tao x Collins III 1/3, Veteran free poll., Laureat x Zlatogor 73-6, (Podarok Kryma free poll, x Tovarishch) 85-104, we recommend using it in the breeding process to improve the existing assortment of peach.
About the Authors
A. V. SmykovRussian Federation
N. V. Mesyats
Russian Federation
References
1. Eremeev G.N., Lishchuk A.I. Selection of drought tolerant varieties and stocks of fruit plants: guidelines. Yalta, 1974, 18 p.
2. The test procedure for distinctness, uniformity and stability - peach, nectarine. Federal State Institution "State Commission". M.: 2000. P. 296-306.
3. Mitrofanov VI., Smykov А. V. Selection technique for immunity to pathogens. Intensification of selection of fruit crops: Collection of scientific works of SNBG, 1999, Vol. 118, P. 98- 113.
4. Nichiporovich A.A. Physiology and productivity of plants / Physiology of photosynthesis. M., 1982, P. 7-33.
5. Ovsyannikov A.S. Methodology for assessing yield and selection of highly productive forms of fruit and berry crops / Program and method for selection of fruit, berry and nut crops. Michurinsk, 1980. P. 433-455.
6. Plugatar Yu.V, Smykov А. V, Opanasenko N.E., SotnikA.I., Babin R.D., Tankevich VV., Mitrofanova I. V., Shoferistov Е.Р., Gorina V.M. et al. То the creation of industrial orchards of fruit crops in Crimea. Scientific and practical publication. Simferopol: Arial, 2017, 212 p.
7. The program and methodology of variety studies of fruit, berry and nut-bearing crops / ed. E.N. Sedov and T.P. Ogoltsova. Orel, 1999. P. 300-350.
8. Ryabov IN. Research on varieties and primary strain testing of stone fruits in the State Nikita Botanical Gardens. In: Research on Varieties of Stone Fruit Crops in the South of USSR (Collection of scientific papers). Collection of scientific papers, Moscow, Kolos, 1969. Vol. 41. P. 5-83.
9. Smykov А. V., Gorina V.M. Assessment of the relationship of the productivity of some stone fruits with the climatic conditions of the Southern coast of the Crimea. Bulletin of the State NikitaBotanical Garden, 2018. Issue. 129. P. 115-121.
10. Smykov A.V., Ivashchenko Yu.A., Fedorova OS. The influence of climatic environmental factors on the Southern coast of the Crimea on the productivity of hybrid forms of peach. Bulletin of the State Nikita Botanical Garden. 2018. Issue. 126. p. 76-82.
11. Khloptseva I.M., Sharova N.I., Korneychuk VA. The Complete Harmonized CMEA- Classifikator for genus Persica Mill. Leningrad, 1988. 46 p.
12. Yablonsky Е.А., Elmanova T.S. The influence of various climatic conditions of the Crimea on the stability of peach cultivars // Collection of scientific works of SNBG. 1979. Vol.79. P. 90-112.
Review
For citations:
Smykov A.V., Mesyats N.V. Comprehensive evaluation of hybrid forms of peach selections of the Nikita Botanical Gardens. Plant Biology and Horticulture: theory, innovation. 2019;(153):121-128. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.36305/2019-4-153-121-128